雅思阅读真题+题目+答案：are we managing to destroy science?

雅思阅读真题+题目+答案：are we managing to destroy science?

雅思阅读真题原文如下：

The government in the UK was concerned about the efficiency of research institutions and set up a Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) to consider what was being done in each university. The article hich follows is a response to the imposition of the RAE.

In the year ahead, the UK government is due to carry out the next Research Assessment Exercise (RAE ). The goal of this regular five-yearly check-up of the university sector is easy to understand: to increase productivity within public sector research. But striving for such productivity can lead to unfortunate consequences. In the case of the RAE, one risk attached to this is the creation of an overly controlling management culture that threatens the future of imaginative science.

Academic institutions are already preparing for the RAE with some anxiety—understand-ably so, for the financial consequences of failure are severe. Departments with a current rating of four or five (research is rated on a five point scale, with five the highest) must maintain their score or face a considerable loss of funding. Meanwhile, those with ratings of two or three are fighting for their survival.

The pressures are forcing research management onto the defensive. Common strategies for increasing academic output include grading individual researchers every year according to RAE criteria, pressurising them to publish anything regardless of quality, diverting funds from key and expensive laboratory science into areas of study such as management, and even threatening to close departments. Another strategy being readily adopted is to remove scientists who appear to be less active in research and replace them with new, probably younger, staff.

Although such measures may deliver results in the RAE , they are putting unsustainable pressure on academic staff. Particularly insidious is the pressure to publish. Put simply, RAE committees in the laboratory sciences must produce four excellent peer-reviewed publications per member of staff to meet the assessment criteria. Hence this is becoming a minimum requirement for existing members of staff, and a benchmark against which to measure new recruits.

But prolific publication does not necessarily add up to good science. Indeed, one young researcher was told in an interview for a lectureship that, although your publications are excellent, unfortunately, there are not enough of them. You should not worry so much about the quality of your publications.'

。。。。。余下雅思阅读真题原文省略！

Questions 27-34

Complete the summary.

Choose NO MORE THAN ONE WORD from the passage for each answer.

Write your answers in boxes 27-34 on your answer sheet.

In the UK, every five years, the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) inspects research institutions to determine their rate of 27 ______________ This tends to cause 28 ______________. in academic institutions because any failure would lead to 29 ______- financial consequences. RAE’s purpose, however, is to increase the academic output within research institutions. In response to the 30 ______________ of RAE, the research institutions are changing the way they do things. Some are forcing their research staff to 31______________ almost anything, while others are moving 32 ______________from a laboratory focus to that of management. Another common approach utilised by management is to remove and 33______________ underperforming research staff. The authors of this paper feel that the pressure on UK research institutions is 34______________

。。。。余下雅思阅读真题题目及答案省略！

雅思阅读真题+题目+答案：are we managing to destroy science?，10元有偿下载完整版!